Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:17

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Morale craters at State Department as mass layoffs loom - The Washington Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
🎀 Pinterest trend; search kpop mother, father, wife, husband, kid
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Was Adam white or black (African)?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
‘Hamilton’ Original Cast Reunites for Tony Awards Medley — Watch - The Hollywood Reporter
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
If my lovely sister sleeps with my boyfriend, what should I do about her?
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
‘Cyberpunk 2077’ Is The Switch 2’s #2 Launch Game - Forbes
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do diabetic people sweat so much?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What makes cars from companies like Dacia or BYD appealing compared to Tesla, especially in Europe?